We are trying our best to make breeze stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the best plugins in the industry. It’ll be there soon! ;)

I run my own server and do not currently use Varnish. It’s something I may look into.

Yeah it is better to test a website over time. It just wasn’t practical to do it live on video. My main focus was to give a good example of what it can do.

Breeze is a great solution. It can’t be expected to perform as well as other solutions that have been on the market for years. It will be interesting to see how you guys develop it over time :)

Thanks for taking out time for Breeze. You have done a great job :) Just read the complete post, just a few pointers to add.

Breeze is just like other caching plugins in the market. We have developed it to reduce the complexities in configuring other caching plugins. That is the reason for not offering a lot of options to the end user.

Indeed, WPRocket has a good reputation in the industry! However, I think Breeze performed more than satisfactory in the tests, considering the fact that it is currently in beta and it’s free of cost. ;)

I have watched the excellent video. You have spent a lot of time Kevin, really appreciates the efforts you put in it. Just one more thing, it’s good to let the cache build while testing on different speed testing tools. The best approach is to test a URL for at least three to five times. The page load time will become almost stable, that will be the actual page load time with cache.

Currently, Breeze is designed for Cloudways servers and it is fully compatible. Can you please care to mention the hosting for the testing site? Do they offer Varnish? If yes, have you configured the “Varnish Server” field correctly?

Thanks for your valuable comments on post revisions. We have noted your suggestion. :)

Once again, thanks for such an honest review.